‘To Kill’ and ‘To Die’ (and Other Suppletive Verbs) in Uto-Aztecan

Title:
‘To Kill’ and ‘To Die’ (and Other Suppletive Verbs) in Uto-Aztecan
Authors:
Haugen, Jason D.; Everdell, Michael
Abstract:
Previous research has noted that verbal suppletion for ergative number agreement (i.e. agreement with the subjects of intransitives and the objects of transitives) is widespread throughout the Uto-Aztecan language family and is therefore reconstructable to Proto-Uto-Aztecan (PUA) (Langacker, 1977). However, no previous works have systematically surveyed the attested forms of suppletion in these languages nor posited specific proposals for reconstructions of particular suppletive morphs back to PUA. We redress this lacuna by surveying the suppletive verbs in the various subgroups of Uto-Aztecan and assessing which of those are sufficiently widespread to reconstruct to PUA. We argue for specific PUA reconstructions for two verbal domains: DIE and KILL, arguing that there were three distinct suppletive verb stems for marking these functions: *muku DIE.SG, *ko(i) DIE.PL, and *mi?a KILL.SG. The plural form of KILL in PUA was derived by adding a causative suffix *-ya to the plural stem for DIE, yielding *ko-ya. Other suppletive verbs in the family are not as easily reconstructable to PUA due to variation in attested forms, although some semantic functions seem to be widespread enough to be reconstructable. The PUA forms serving those functions would have been altered in different ways at different times by a lexical replacement process endemic to cases of strong supetion, i.e. incursion (Juge, 2000). We also consider the issue of potential areal contact involving suppletion patterns in the areas.
Citation:
Haugen, Jason D., and Michael Everdell. 2015. "‘To Kill’ and ‘To Die’ (and Other Suppletive Verbs) in Uto-Aztecan." Language Dynamics and Change 5(2): 227-281.
Publisher:
Brill Academic Publishers
DATE ISSUED:
2015-01-01
Department:
Anthropology
Type:
Article
PUBLISHED VERSION:
10.1163/22105832-00502005
Additional Links:
http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/22105832-00502005
PERMANENT LINK:
http://hdl.handle.net/11282/594525

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Jason D.en
dc.contributor.authorEverdell, Michaelen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-21T14:49:14Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-21T14:49:14Zen
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en
dc.identifier.citationHaugen, Jason D., and Michael Everdell. 2015. "‘To Kill’ and ‘To Die’ (and Other Suppletive Verbs) in Uto-Aztecan." Language Dynamics and Change 5(2): 227-281.en
dc.identifier.issn2210-5824en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11282/594525en
dc.description.abstractPrevious research has noted that verbal suppletion for ergative number agreement (i.e. agreement with the subjects of intransitives and the objects of transitives) is widespread throughout the Uto-Aztecan language family and is therefore reconstructable to Proto-Uto-Aztecan (PUA) (Langacker, 1977). However, no previous works have systematically surveyed the attested forms of suppletion in these languages nor posited specific proposals for reconstructions of particular suppletive morphs back to PUA. We redress this lacuna by surveying the suppletive verbs in the various subgroups of Uto-Aztecan and assessing which of those are sufficiently widespread to reconstruct to PUA. We argue for specific PUA reconstructions for two verbal domains: DIE and KILL, arguing that there were three distinct suppletive verb stems for marking these functions: *muku DIE.SG, *ko(i) DIE.PL, and *mi?a KILL.SG. The plural form of KILL in PUA was derived by adding a causative suffix *-ya to the plural stem for DIE, yielding *ko-ya. Other suppletive verbs in the family are not as easily reconstructable to PUA due to variation in attested forms, although some semantic functions seem to be widespread enough to be reconstructable. The PUA forms serving those functions would have been altered in different ways at different times by a lexical replacement process endemic to cases of strong supetion, i.e. incursion (Juge, 2000). We also consider the issue of potential areal contact involving suppletion patterns in the areas.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishersen
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/22105832-00502005en
dc.relation.urlhttp://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/22105832-00502005en
dc.subject.departmentAnthropologyen_US
dc.title‘To Kill’ and ‘To Die’ (and Other Suppletive Verbs) in Uto-Aztecanen_US
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalLanguage Dynamics and Changeen
dc.subject.keywordSuppletionen_US
dc.subject.keywordDiachronyen_US
dc.subject.keywordLinguistic typologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordAreal linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.keywordUto-Aztecanen_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage227en_US
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Language Dynamics and Change.en
All Items in The Five Colleges of Ohio Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.